𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations, and the hippocampus. I. An empirical analysis

✍ Scribed by Michael Van Elzakker; Randall C. O'Reilly; Jerry W. Rudy


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
133 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
1050-9631

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

After training on a set of four ordered, simultaneous, odor discrimination problems (A+B−, B+C−, C+D−, D+E), intact rats display transitivity: When tested on the novel combination BD, they choose B. Rats with damage to the hippocampus, however, do not show transitivity (Dusek and Eichenbaum, 1997. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:7109–7114). These results have been interpreted as support for the idea that the hippocampus is a relational memory storage system that enables the subject to make comparisons among representations of the individual problems and choose based on inferential logic. We provide evidence for a simpler explanation. Specifically, subjects make their choices based on the absolute excitatory value of the individual stimuli. This value determines the ability of that stimulus to attract a response. This conclusion emerged because after training on a five‐problem set (A+B−, B+C−, C+D−, D+E−, E+F−) rats preferred B when tested with BE, but not when tested with BD. The implication of these results for how to conceptualize the role of the hippocampus in transitive‐like phenomena is discussed. Hippocampus 2003;13:334–340. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive r
✍ Michael J. Frank; Jerry W. Rudy; Randall C. O'Reilly 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 283 KB

## Abstract A computational neural network model is presented that explains how the hippocampus can contribute to transitive inference performance observed in rats (Dusek and Eichenbaum, 1997. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:7109–7114; Van Elzakker et al., 2003. Hippocampus 12:this issue). In contrast