## Abstract Tracer kinetic methods employed for quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) share common roots with earlier tracer studies involving arterial‐venous sampling and other dynamic imaging modalities. This article reviews the essential founda
Tracer kinetic model–driven registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI time-series data
✍ Scribed by Giovanni A. Buonaccorsi; James P.B. O'Connor; Angela Caunce; Caleb Roberts; Sue Cheung; Yvonne Watson; Karen Davies; Lynn Hope; Alan Jackson; Gordon C. Jayson; Geoffrey J.M. Parker
- Book ID
- 102954014
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 698 KB
- Volume
- 58
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0740-3194
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI) time series data are subject to unavoidable physiological motion during acquisition (e.g., due to breathing) and this motion causes significant errors when fitting tracer kinetic models to the data, particularly with voxel‐by‐voxel fitting approaches. Motion correction is problematic, as contrast enhancement introduces new features into postcontrast images and conventional registration similarity measures cannot fully account for the increased image information content. A methodology is presented for tracer kinetic model–driven registration that addresses these problems by explicitly including a model of contrast enhancement in the registration process. The iterative registration procedure is focused on a tumor volume of interest (VOI), employing a three‐dimensional (3D) translational transformation that follows only tumor motion. The implementation accurately removes motion corruption in a DCE‐MRI software phantom and it is able to reduce model fitting errors and improve localization in 3D parameter maps in patient data sets that were selected for significant motion problems. Sufficient improvement was observed in the modeling results to salvage clinical trial DCE‐MRI data sets that would otherwise have to be rejected due to motion corruption. Magn Reson Med 58:1010–1019, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Pharmacokinetic parameters corresponding to perfused microvascular volume determined from dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI data were compared to immunohistochemical measures of microvascular density (MVD) and perfused microvascular density. DCE MRI data from human mammary tumors (MDA
## Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of water exchange on tracer kinetic parameter estimates derived from __T__~1~‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI data using a direct quantitative comparison with DCE‐CT. Data were acquired from 12 patients with bladder canc