## Abstract TRAโ1โ60 antigen has been related to the presence of embryonal germ cell carcinoma (EC) and carcinoma __in situ__. Our study further investigated the clinical efficacy of TRAโ1โ60 as a serum tumor marker for germ cell cancer in the testis. Three groups of patients with germ cell tumors
Tra-1-60: A new serum marker in patients with germ-cell tumors
โ Scribed by J. Marrink; P. W. Andrews; P. J. Van Brummen; H. J. De Jong; D. T. H. Sleijfer; H. Schraffordt Koops; J. W. Oosterhuis
- Book ID
- 102869968
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 506 KB
- Volume
- 49
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
TRA-1-60 is a monoclonal antibody (MAb) that recognizes a mucin-like antigenic determinant expressed on the surface of embryonal carcinoma (EC) progenitor cells. In order to determine whether this antigen is released into the serum of patients with a non-seminomatous germ-cell tumor (NSGCT), we developed a sensitive 2-step immunoenzymometric assay. Of 42 EC-positive NSGCT patients tested, 32 (76%) were found to release TRA-I -60-reactive antigen into their serum, in contrast to I positive finding in 10 EC-negative NSGCT patients. The marker was found in 67% (lo/ 15) of the EC-positive patients who were negative for both AFP and HCG. Sera from seminoma patients did not contain elevated levels of the TRA-1-60 antigen. Therefore, we propose that the TRA-1-60 antigen is a useful additional serum marker for following the progress of NSGCT(EC+) patients.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
BACKGROUND. โฃ-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) closely follow the course of germ cell tumors (GCTs) and are widely used for diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up purposes. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance of tumor markers a
The allocation of patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCT) to different treatment programs based on clinical characteristics is standard in the design of clinical trials today. Studies have shown that substantial differences exist between entry criteria and that these differences could influenc