✦ LIBER ✦

Toxicant- and response-specific comparisons of statistical methods for estimating effective concentrations

✍ Scribed by Michael R. Hughes; A. John Bailer; Debra L. Denton

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2001
Tongue: English
Weight: 68 KB
Volume: 20
Category: Article
ISSN: 0730-7268
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620200629

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

An empirical comparison of effective con

An empirical comparison of effective concentration estimators for evaluating aquatic toxicity test responses

✍ A. John Bailer; Michael R. Hughes; Debra L. Denton; James T. Oris 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 117 KB 👁 1 views

A general best-fit method for concentrat

A general best-fit method for concentration-response curves and the estimation of low-effect concentrations

✍ Martin Scholze,; Wolfgang Boedeker; Michael Faust; Thomas Backhaus; Rolf Altenbu 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 141 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Risk assessments of toxic chemicals currently rely heavily on the use of no‐observed‐effect concentrations (NOECs). Due to several crucial flaws in this concept, however, discussion of replacing NOECs with statistically estimated low‐effect concentrations continues. This paper describes

A comparison of multivariate statistical

A comparison of multivariate statistical methods for estimating expected consequences for low-probability and high-consequence incidents

✍ S. Desai; G. J. Lim; M. Karson 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 307 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The catastrophic incidents involving hazardous materials (hazmats) have often been termed as low probability and high consequence (LPHC). The purpose of this article is to address some fundamental questions with regard to hazmats incidents: What is the expected consequence of a hazmats