๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Towards a computational model of social comparison: Some implications for the cognitive architecture

โœ Scribed by Natalie Fridman; Gal A. Kaminka


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
661 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
1389-0417

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


We investigate a general cognitive model of group behaviors, based on Festinger's social comparison theory (SCT), a prominent social psychology theory. We describe two possible implementations of SCT process at an architectural level, on the basis of the Soar cognitive architecture. The first, which seems to follow directly from Festinger's social comparison theory, treats the SCT process as an uncertainty-resolution method. The second, takes a different approach, in which an SCT process is constantly active, in parallel to any problem solving activity. We present the implementation of these approaches in the Soar cognitive architecture and argue that one is more suitable for modeling crowd behaviors. In previous work, we have shown that SCT covers a variety of pedestrian movement phenomena. In this paper we present the use of the SCT model in generation of imitational behavior in loosely-coupled groups. Based on experiments with human subjects, we show that SCT generates behavior in-tune with human crowd behavior.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Social power: some implications for the
โœ Teresa Hagan; Jenny Donnison ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 149 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Practitioners of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), are faced by real dilemmas when having to take into account the consequences of unequal power relations in society. Whilst a perspective on social power is not new in psychology, its implications for therapeutic practice have yet to be fully worked

A theoretical model of differential soci
โœ GEORGE M. MARAKAS; RICHARD D. JOHNSON; JONATHAN W. PALMER ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 425 KB

This paper explores the use of metaphorical personi"cation (anthropomorphism) as an aid to describing and understanding the complexities of computing technologies. This common and seemingly intuitive practice (it &&reads'', &&writes'', &&thinks'', &&is friendly'', &&catches and transmits viruses'',