𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Topical adapalene gel 0·1% vs. isotretinoin gel 0·05% in the treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized open-label clinical trial

✍ Scribed by D. Ioannides; D. Rigopoulos; A. Katsambas


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
104 KB
Volume
147
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-0963

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Background:

Topical application of isotretinoin and adapalene has proved effective in treating acne vulgaris. both drugs demonstrate therapeutic advantages and less irritancy over tretinoin, the most widely used treatment for acne. they both act as retinoid agonists, but differ in their affinity profile for nuclear and cytosolic retinoic acid receptors.

Objective:

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of adapalene gel 0.1% and isotretinoin gel 0.05% in the treatment of acne vulgaris of the face, in a randomized open-label clinical trial.

Methods:

Eighty patients were enrolled and were instructed to apply adapalene gel 0.1% or isotretinoin gel 0.05% once daily over a 12-week treatment period. efficacy determination included noninflammatory and inflammatory lesion counts by the investigator and global evaluation of improvement. cutaneous tolerance was assessed by determining erythema, scaling and burning with pruritus.

Results:

Adapalene and isotretinoin gels were highly effective in treating facial acne. adapalene gel produced greater reductions in noninflammatory and inflammatory lesion counts than did isotretinoin gel, but differences between treatments were not statistically significant. adapalene gel was significantly better tolerated than isotretinoin gel during the whole treatment period.

Conclusions:

The two gels studied demonstrated comparable efficacy. when adapalene and isotretinoin were compared, significantly lower skin irritation was noted with adapalene, indicating that adapalene may begin a new era of treatment with low-irritant retinoids.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of adapalene 0·1% solution an
✍ Ellis; Millikan; Smith; Chalker; Swinyer; Katz; Berger; Mills Jr; Baker; Verscho 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 370 KB

A multicentre study was conducted to compare clinical safety and efficacy of adapalene 0.1% solution and tretinoin 0.025% gel, both topical treatments for acne, in a once-daily dosage regimen for 12 weeks. A total of 297 patients were enrolled by eight investigators in this randomized, investigator-

A comparison of the efficacy and tolerab
✍ Cunliffe; Poncet; Loesche; Verschoore 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 293 KB

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine if adapalene 0.1% gel (Differin) provided superior efficacy and better tolerability than tretinoin 0.025% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris. All comparative studies, both published and unpublished, from the United States and Europe, that fulfill

Evaluation of clinical efficacy and safe
✍ Grosshans; Marks; Mascaro; Torras; Meynadier; Alirezai; Finlay; Soto; Poncet; Ve 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 233 KB

A randomized, multicentre, investigator-masked study was conducted in 105 patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris to compare the efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1% gel with tretinoin 0.025% gel after three months of treatment, with particular emphasis on reduction in inflammatory lesion coun