Tooth wear in Australian Aboriginal populations from the river Murray valley

✍ Scribed by Stephen Molnar; Lindsay Richards; Jeffrey McKee; Iva Molnar

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 1989
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 904 KB
• Volume: 79
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0002-9483
• DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330790206

✦ Synopsis

The study of tooth wear among prehistoric and recent populations has frequently been concerned with the rate and pattern of wear over the dental arches. In this report we considered the question of tooth wear variation among collections of Australian Aboriginal crania recovered from several sites along the Murray River in Southeastern Australia. These crania represent the remains of relatively recent populations from about 2,000 years ago until the early 19th century. The degree of tooth wear for each dental arch was recorded by a n established method of determining the ratio of exposed dentin. The pattern or distribution of wear over each arch was summarized by principal component analysis. The mean wear degree and pattern were compared among four geographical grouping of crania separated by up to 700 mi1es.of river frontage.

Our results showed, as expected, a significant difference between the welldefined population at the Lower Murray site (Swanport) and the three upriver groups. However, there were significant differences among these three collections as well. Sexual dimorphism was noted but was only significant in the Lower Murray group; the mean wear was greater and also more variable among the males. At the second of the Middle Murray sites the pattern of wear was different and the degree of wear was significantly less than in the other groups. A possible explanation for this diversity may be environmental and subsistence base differences. The evidence from the Lower Murray supports this possibility, but the differences among the other three groups are not as clearly established. However, our results do suggest that the Murray Black collection, from which these crania were obtained, may not be as homogeneous a group as previously believed.