✦ LIBER ✦

Tooth, chin, bone and body size correlations

✍ Scribed by D. L. Anderson; G. W. Thompson; F. Popovich

Book ID: 111698231
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1977
Tongue: English
Weight: 336 KB
Volume: 46
Category: Article
ISSN: 0002-9483
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330460103

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Evolution of genetically correlated trai

Evolution of genetically correlated traits: Tooth size and body size in baboons

✍ Leslea J. Hlusko; Loren R. Lease; Michael C. Mahaney 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 159 KB 👁 2 views

Tooth-Size, Body-Size and “Giant” Fossil

Tooth-Size, Body-Size and “Giant” Fossil Man

✍ STANLEY M. GARN AND ARTHUR B. LEWIS 📂 Article 📅 1958 🏛 American Anthropological Association 🌐 English ⚖ 412 KB

Tooth-Size, Body-Size and "Giant" Fossil

Tooth-Size, Body-Size and "Giant" Fossil Man

✍ Stanley M. Garn and Arthur B. Lewis 📂 Article 📅 1958 🏛 American Anthropological Association 🌐 English ⚖ 800 KB

Correlation of carnassial tooth size and

Correlation of carnassial tooth size and body weight in recent carnivores (mammalia)

✍ Legendre, Serge; Roth, Claudia 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 740 KB

Relationship between tooth and long bone

Relationship between tooth and long bone size

✍ Christopher L. B. Lavelle 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 200 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract Canonical correlations between tooth and long bone dimensions showed a greater correlation for Anglo‐Saxons and apes than for Nineteenth Century Londoners, i.e., coefficients of 0.75 for gorilla, 0.72 for chimpanzee, 0.69 for orang‐utans, 0.74 for Anglo‐Saxons, but 0.53 for Nineteenth C

Static allometry of mammalian teeth and

Static allometry of mammalian teeth and the correlation of tooth size and body size in contemporary mammals

✍ G. Ken Creighton 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 555 KB