๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Tocqueville, Lieber, and Bagehot: Liberalism Confronts the World

โœ Scribed by David Clinton


Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Leaves
170
Series
The Palgrave Macmillan Series on the History of International Thought
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Alexis de Tocqueville, Francis Lieber, and Walter Bagehot are all mid-19th-century liberals who both commented on and helped to shape public affairs in the three premier liberal countries of the time: France, the United States, and Britain. Each also had an interest in international politics that stemmed from certain aspects of his broader political philosophy. But what did liberalism mean in this context--spreading the benefits of liberty, building an international society, or practicing tolerant non-intervention? These three men demonstrate the varieties of liberal thought of that time, and in so doing illustrate some important choices facing our own.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Tocqueville, Lieber, and Bagehot: Libera
โœ David Clinton (auth.) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› Palgrave Macmillan US ๐ŸŒ English

<p>Current discussions of liberalism in world affairs tend to take a shortsighted view of the historical antecedents of the school of thought. Most jump directly from Kant to Wilson with little pause in between. In this book, Clinton has selected three thinkers to exemplify developments in the liber

The Humane Comedy: Constant, Tocqueville
โœ George Armstrong Kelly ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐ŸŒ English

In this study of French liberalism in the first half of the nineteenth century and its continuing relevance to political theory and practice, emphasis is given to the tensions and fissures within liberalism as well as to its struggles against Jacobinism, conservatism and socialism. It is a blend of

The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocq
โœ Roger Boesche ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2019 ๐Ÿ› Cornell University Press ๐ŸŒ English

<p>Responding to the twentieth-century tendency to impose anachronistic political categories on Tocqueville, Roger Boesche reminds us that like Stendhal, Balzac, Hugo, Lamartine, Flaubert, and other writers of his generation, he was a nineteenth-century Frenchman reacting to contemporary French conc