✦ LIBER ✦

To the editors of Process Safety Progress

✍ Scribed by Walter Frank; Raymond “Randy” Freeman; Dennis Hendershot

Book ID: 112179754
Publisher: American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Year: 2012
Tongue: English
Weight: 430 KB
Volume: 31
Category: Article
ISSN: 1066-8527
DOI: 10.1002/prs.11491

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

To the editors of process safety progres

To the editors of process safety progress

✍ Paul Baybutt 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 American Institute of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 49 KB

Author's response to the editors of proc

Author's response to the editors of process safety progress

✍ James Moseman 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 American Institute of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 716 KB

Process Without Progress: Emergency Medi

Process Without Progress: Emergency Medicine, Patient Safety, and the Need for Science

✍ Christopher Nemeth 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 143 KB

Letter to the editor: Safety software su

Letter to the editor: Safety software survey

✍ John F.J. Kibblewhite 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 62 KB

Process Safety Group, 2004 - Process Saf

Process Safety Group, 2004 - Process Safety Group, 2004 BP Process Safety Group ,BP Process Safety Series: ‘Sharing the Experience’ (2004/05) IChemE.

✍ Mike Brown 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Institution of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 53 KB

The safety of process automation

✍ A. Toola 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 753 KB

The effect of automation on process safety is not clear. On the one hand, automation is blamed for posing risk and for increasing the chance of human error in situations involving disturbances; on the other hand, it is admitted that automation enables sophisticated process control and handling of di