𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Time trends of breast cancer survival in Europe in relation to incidence and mortality

✍ Scribed by Milena Sant; Silvia Francisci; Riccardo Capocaccia; Arduino Verdecchia; Claudia Allemani; Franco Berrino


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
French
Weight
265 KB
Volume
119
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Increasing breast cancer survival, observed in most western countries, is not easily interpreted: it could be due to better treatment, more effective treatment due to earlier diagnosis or simply lead‐time bias. Increased diagnostic activity (e.g., screening) can inflate both incidence and survival. To understand interrelations between incidence, mortality and survival trends and their consequences, we analyzed survival trends in relation to mortality and incidence. Starting with observed survival from EUROCARE, mortality from WHO and using the MIAMOD method, we estimated breast cancer incidence trends from 1970 to 2005 in 10 European countries. To smooth out peaks in incidence and survival due to early diagnosis activity, survival trends were assumed similar to those observed by EUROCARE in 1983–1994. The following patterns emerged: (1) increasing survival with increasing incidence and declining or stable mortality (Sweden, Finland); (2) slight survival increase, marked incidence increase and slight mortality decrease (Denmark, the Netherlands and France); (3) increasing survival, marked decrease in mortality and tendency to incidence stabilization (UK); (4) marked survival increase, steady or decreasing mortality and moderate increases in incidence (Spain, Italy); (5) stable survival, increasing incidence and mortality (Estonia). In most countries survival increased, indicating a real advantage for patients when accompanied by decreasing or stable mortality, and attributable to improved cancer care (Sweden, UK, France, Italy and Spain). In Finland (with high survival), the Netherlands and Denmark, increasing mortality and incidence indicate increasing breast cancer risk, probably related to life‐style factors. In Estonia, low and stable survival in the context of increasing incidence and mortality suggests inadequate care. Β© 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Recent trends in breast cancer incidence
✍ James V. Lacey Jr.; Susan S. Devesa; Louise A. Brinton πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 91 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Breast cancer accounts for one‐third of cancer diagnoses and 15% of cancer deaths in U.S. women. Its 192,000 cases and 40,000 deaths in 2001 make it the most common incident cancer (excluding superficial skin cancers) and second leading cause of cancer death. Over one‐half of the 300,00

Mortality trends for cervical squamous a
✍ Mark E. Sherman; Sophia S. Wang; Joseph Carreon; Susan S. Devesa πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 183 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND In the United States, detection of squamous carcinoma in situ (CIS) by screening has led to reduced rates for invasive squamous carcinoma and lower mortality. Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) rates also have increased, but invasive cervical adenocarcinoma rates have not decli

Ovarian cancer in Europe: Cross-sectiona
✍ Freddie Bray; Anja Helena Loos; Sandro Tognazzo; Carlo La Vecchia πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 371 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

We have considered trends in incidence and mortality in 28 European countries using incidence data from successive volumes of Cancer Incidence in Five Continents and mortality from the WHO database. Countries with the highest rates in the early 1960s included the Nordic countries, Austria, Germany a

Analysis of recent trends in prostate ca
✍ Dennis, Leslie K.; Resnick, Martin I. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 212 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## BACKGROUND. There is debate over whether the recent increases seen in prostate cancer are due to lead-time bias from screening, or identification of clinically insignificant lesions. METHODS. Population-based incidence rates for 1973-1996 were calculated, based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology,

Time trends (1998–2007) in brain cancer
✍ Frank de Vocht; Igor Burstyn; John W Cherrie πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 189 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Mobile phone use in the United Kingdom and other countries has risen steeply since the early 1990's when the first digital mobile phones were introduced. There is an ongoing controversy about whether radio frequency (RF) exposure from mobile phones increases the risk of brain cancer. However, given

Genetic variation in SIPA1 in relation t
✍ Mia M. Gaudet; Kent Hunter; Paul Pharoah; Alison M. Dunning; Kristy Driver; Jola πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 84 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Genetic variation in __SIPA1__, __signal‐induced proliferation‐associated gene 1__, has been proposed to be associated with aggressive breast tumor characteristics related to metastasis and worse prognosis in humans and rodents. To test this hypothesis, we genotyped 3 single nucleotide