𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Time-risk Discount Valuation of Life Contracts

✍ Scribed by Dian-fa Chen; George Xiang

Publisher
Institute of Applied Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Chinese Mathematical Society
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
212 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
0168-9673

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

On a generalization of the expected disc
On a generalization of the expected discounted penalty function in a discrete-time insurance risk model
✍ David Landriault πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 139 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract In this paper, we propose a generalization of the expected discounted penalty function and analyze the proposed analytic tool in the framework of the compound binomial model with a general premium rate __c__ (__c__β€‰βˆˆβ€‰β„•^+^) received per period. We derive an explicit expression for this g

Life-time risk of different cancers in h
Life-time risk of different cancers in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (hnpcc) syndrome
✍ Markku Aarnio; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Lauri A. Aaltonen; Minna NystrΓΆm-Lahti; Heik πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 431 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Identification of hereditary non-polyporis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) indicates theoretical life-time risks of 50% for the descendants of an affected family member and of 100% for the true gene carriers. However, besides colorectal cancer (CRC), many other cancer types and sites are also involved, wh

093076 (E50) Risk-minimizing hedging str
093076 (E50) Risk-minimizing hedging strategies for unit-linked life insurance contracts : Moller T., Working Paper NΒ°145, Laboratory of Actuarial Mathematics, University of Copenhagen
πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 171 KB

against older groups and vice-versa, but gender-related bias was apparent. The findings of Matthews and Moran were generally confirmed. The results are discussed with reference to four main issues: (1) demographic bias effects-which are generally weak; (2) stereotyping on the basis of gender and/or