Requirements for the number of nonthermal electrons which must be accelerated in the impulsive phase of a flare are reviewed. These are uncertain by two orders of magnitude depending on whether hard X-rays above 25 keV are produced primarily by hot thermal electron.,; which contain a small fraction
Time delays in large and small loop thermal models for hard X-ray bursts
β Scribed by Dean F. Smith; Lorant A. Muth
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1984
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 568 KB
- Volume
- 90
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0038-0938
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The time histories of the emission at 10, 30, and 100 keV averaged over the loop from small and large loop thermal models of hard X-ray emission are studied. The small (15 000 km) loop cases show a characteristic delay in the peak of the 100 keV emission relative to the 30 keV emission of about 1.5 s which should be detectable. The large (47 000 kin) loop cases show no delay, but in the case of a continuous energy input, the 30 keV emission has a peak at 9.5 s whereas the 100 keV emission rises monotonically. Again, this difference should be detectable to the extent that it is not washed out by a dominant beam or escaping tail component which is not considered in this paper. A large loop case where only classical and saturated heat conduction are allowed is considered. The 30 keV emission has a peak at 7.5 s whereas the 100 keV emission rises monotonically. The peak temperature reached is 8 x 10 7 K and the probability of finding examples in the data uncontaminated by a dominant beam or escaping tail component should be considerably higher than in the cases with higher rates of energy input.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
In a Note Added in Proof in , the statement is made that "As pointed out by Spicer (private communication), estimate [of flare electric fields] is off by four orders of magnitude for his conditions because ... charges move so as to short out most of this field (cf. Drake and Lee, 1977)." As Smith (