𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro

✍ Scribed by Rochelle L. Nicholls; Andreas C. Schirm; Benjamin O. Jeffcote; Markus S. Kuster


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
206 KB
Volume
25
Category
Article
ISSN
0736-0266

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Despite ongoing evolution in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prosthesis design, restricted flexion continues to be common postoperatively. Compressive tibiofemoral force during flexion is generated through the interaction between soft tissues and prosthesis geometry. In this study, we compared the compressive tibiofemoral force in vitro of four commonly used prostheses: fixed‐bearing PCL (posterior cruciate ligament)‐retaining (PFC), mobile‐bearing posterior‐stabilized (PS), posterior‐stabilized with a High Flex femoral component (HF), and mobile‐bearing PCL‐sacrificing (LCS). Fourteen fresh‐frozen cadaver knee joints were tested in a passive motion rig, and tibiofemoral force measured using a modified tibial baseplate instrumented with six load cells. The implants without posterior stabilization displayed an exponential increase in force after 90° of flexion, while PS implants maintained low force throughout the range of motion. The fixed‐bearing PFC prosthesis displayed the highest peak force (214 ± 68 N at 150° flexion). Sacrifice of the PCL decreased the peak force to a level comparable with the LCS implant. The use of a PCL‐substituting post and cam system reduced the peak force up to 78%, irrespective of whether it was a high‐flex or a standard PS knee. However, other factors such as preoperative range of motion, knee joint kinematics, soft tissue impingement, and implantation technique play a role in postoperative knee function. The present study suggests that a posterior‐stabilized TKA design might be advantageous in reducing soft tissue tension in deep flexion. Further research is necessary to fully understand all factors affecting knee flexion after TKA. © 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 25:1506–1512, 2007


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Erratum: Tibiofemoral force following to
✍ Rochelle L. Nicholls; Andreas C. Schirm; Benjamin O. Jeffcote; Markus S. Kuster 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 34 KB

## Abstract The authors have inadvertently left out several acknowledgments and wish to add them here This study was supported by DePuy International, the University of Western Australia, the Fremantle Hospital, and Mrs. Huggler. We would like to thank Dr. Hilaire Jacob for his help with the deve

In vivo comparison of wear particles bet
✍ Kentaro Iwakiri; Yukihide Minoda; Akio Kobayashi; Ryo Sugama; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; F 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 161 KB

## Abstract Reduction of wear with highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been reported in __in vitro__ and __in vivo__ studies of total hip prostheses. However, use of HXLPE in total knee prostheses is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare __in vivo__ polyethylene wear par