I n the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of enoxaparin versus un- fractionated heparin (UFH) for the prevention of venous thrombosis in medical patients, Leykum et al. 1 concluded that lowmolecular-weight heparin (LMWH) offered greater cost utility. This important benefit was based on a single advantage
Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin in medical patients with cancer
β Scribed by Gary H. Lyman
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 312 KB
- Volume
- 115
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This case further supports
The use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as prophylaxis for veno-occlusive disease of the liver has been studied in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The present study analyzes the effect of LMWH on the time course of platelet recovery after BMT. Significantly accelerated
The incidence of antibodies to heparin-PF4 complexes (H-PF4) has been evaluated in patients who were under heparin therapy for more than 7 days: 109 patients treated with unfractionated heparin (UH) and 100 patients with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The presence of antibodies was identified