𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Three-year follow-up after intravascular γ-radiation for in-stent restenosis in saphenous vein grafts

✍ Scribed by Seung-Woon Rha; Pramod Kuchulakanti; Andrew E. Ajani; Edouard Cheneau; Ellen E. Pinnow; Daniel A. Canos; Rebecca Torguson; Augusto D. Pichard; Lowell F. Satler; Kenneth M. Kent; Steven Ramee; Paul Teirstein; Joseph Lindsay; Ron Waksman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
107 KB
Volume
65
Category
Article
ISSN
1522-1946

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The Washington Radiation for In‐Stent Restenosis Trial in Saphenous Vein Grafts (SVG WRIST) demonstrated safety and efficacy of intravascular radiation therapy (IRT) for the treatment of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) in SVG at 12 months. In this study, we aimed to examine whether the safety and efficacy of IRT is durable up to 36 months. One hundred twenty patients with diffuse ISR in SVG underwent balloon angioplasty, laser or atherectomy ablation, and/or additional stenting. After successful intervention, patients were randomly assigned in a double‐blind fashion to intravascular treatment with a ribbon containing either iridium (Ir)‐192 (n = 60) or nonradioactive seeds (n = 60). The prescribed dose at 2 mm from the source was either 14 or 15 Gy in vessels 2.5–4.0 mm or 18 Gy in vessels > 4.0 mm in diameter. At 36 months, target lesion revascularization (TLR; 43% vs. 66%; P = 0.02) and target lesion revascularization‐major adverse cardiac event (TLR‐MACE; 49% vs. 71%; P = 0.02) rates continued to be lower in the IRT group, but both target vessel revascularization (TVR; 59% vs. 71%; P = 0.17) and TVR‐MACE (63% vs. 77%; P = 0.11) rates were not. In SVG WRIST, patients with ISR treated with IRT had a marked reduction in the need for repeat TLR at 36 months, with sustained clinical benefit at 3 years despite late recurrences, which were more pronounced in the radiation group. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Three-year follow-up after intracoronary
✍ Ekaterina Iofina; Peter Radke; Daniela Schubert; Roswitha Langenberg; Rüdiger Bl 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Background: Most studies that proved intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) to be highly effective to reduce recurrent restenosis after treatment of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) have looked at time periods up to 12 months. Whether the beneficial effect from radiation is sustained during lon