Three reliability methods for fatigue crack growth
โ Scribed by Wing Kam Liu; Yijung Chen; Ted Belytschko; Yuan Jie Lua
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 973 KB
- Volume
- 53
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0013-7944
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
in this paper, three reliability methods (1) a first order reliability method (FORM) based on the total derivative method (TDM), (2) FORM based on the Lagrange multiplier formulation (LMF) and (3) a Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) with pseudo-exact sampling technique are applied to curvilinear fatigue crack growth problems. The crack can follow an arbitrary path which is determined by a crack direction law. A boundary integral element method is used to determine the mechanical response. With the help of the pseudo-exact sampling technique used in MCS, we are able to determine an extremely low probability of failure as low as 10-6 with high accuracy. A comparison of the three methods shows that the LMF is the most efficient method for the general fatigue crack growth reliability problems. For the class of problems we considered, LMF agrees very well with Monte Carlo simulation, indicating that it is quite accurate.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A review of several statistical and probabilistic approaches to the problem of fatigue crack growth shows that many Markov models are equivalent in that they express the probability density of the crack length at time t as solutions of the Kolmogorov, or Fokker-Plank, equations. Further, it is shown