𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Thought Experiments Rethought - and Reperceived


Category
Fiction

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Epistemology: 50 Puzzles, Paradoxes, and
✍ Kevin McCain πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2021 πŸ› Routledge 🌐 English

<p><span>In this new kind of entrΓ©e to contemporary epistemology, Kevin McCain presents fifty of the field’s most important puzzles, paradoxes, and thought experiments. Assuming no familiarity with epistemology from the reader, McCain titles each case with a memorable name, describes the details of

The Unthought in Contemporary Islamic Th
✍ Mohammed Arkoun πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› Saqi Books 🌐 English

Drawing on a combination of pertinent disciplines - history, sociology, psychology and anthropology - the author's approach subjects every system of belief and non-belief, every tradition of exegesis, theology and jurisprudence to a critique aimed at liberating reason from the grip of dogmatic postu

The unthought in contemporary Islamic th
✍ Mohammed Arkoun πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› Saqi 🌐 English

Drawing on a combination of pertinent disciplines - history, sociology, psychology and anthropology - the author's approach subjects every system of belief and non-belief, every tradition of exegesis, theology and jurisprudence to a critique aimed at liberating reason from the grip of dogmatic postu

Aesthetics: 50 Puzzles, Paradoxes, and T
✍ Michel-Antoine Xhignesse πŸ“‚ Library πŸ› Routledge 🌐 English

<p><span>Aesthetics: 50 Puzzles, Paradoxes, and Thought Experiments</span><span> is a teaching-focused resource, which highlights the contributions that imaginative scenarios―paradoxes, puzzles, and thought experiments alike―have made to the development of contemporary analytic aesthetics. The book

Thought Experiments
✍ Roy A. Sorensen πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1992 🌐 English

Sorensen presents a general theory of thought experiments: what they are, how they work, what are their virtues and vices. On Sorensen's view, philosophy differs from science in degree, but not in kind. For this reason, he claims, it is possible to understand philosophical thought experiments by c