๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Thirty-four cases of esophageal perforation: the experience of a district general hospital in the UK

โœ Scribed by E. A. Griffiths; N. Yap; J. Poulter; M. T. Hendrickse; M. Khurshid


Book ID
108982214
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
99 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
1120-8694

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Esophageal perforation is uncommon and traditionally has a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to perform a 13-year retrospective review of the cases managed in our district general hospital. Thirty-four cases of esophageal perforation diagnosed between 1995 and 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 20 males and 14 females with a median age of 64 (range 23-86) years. The etiology of the perforations were Boerhaave's syndrome (n = 19), therapeutic endoscopy (n = 9), diagnostic endoscopy (n = 2), gastric lavage injury (n = 1), foreign body (n = 1), blunt chest trauma (n = 1), and spontaneous tumor perforation (n = 1). Only 11 cases (32%) had evidence of surgical emphysema upon examination. In 50% of cases, another clinical diagnosis was initially suspected. Twenty-four were treated surgically and 10 cases managed non-operatively. Surgical treatment included thoracotomy with primary repair (n = 9), T-tube drainage (n = 7), emergency esophagectomy (n = 1), or intra-operative stent insertion (n = 1). Four cases had primary repair and fundal wrap via abdominal approach without thoracotomy. Two patients were treated with washout and drainage only. Eight patients died overall (in-hospital mortality 23.5%). Esophageal perforations are often initially misdiagnosed and the majority do not have surgical emphysema. There are a wide variety of methods to manage esophageal perforation. Management tailored to the location and size of perforation, degree of contamination, and underlying cause appears to result in a reasonable prognosis.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES