𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Thickness variation in the thermoforming of poly(methyl methacrylate) and high-impact polystyrene sheets

✍ Scribed by M. O. Lai; D. L. Holt


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1975
Tongue
English
Weight
730 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-8995

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The influence of material flow properties on the variation of wall thickness in a thermoformed part was investigated by measuring the thickness reduction at the pole of free‐formed axisymmetric domes of poly(methyl methacrylate) and high‐impact polystyrene. It was found that at a given pole height, the thickness reduction in poly(methyl methacrylate) was less than in high‐impact polystyrene, i.e., the wall thickness in a part formed from poly(methyl methacrylate) will be more uniform than in a part formed from high‐impact polystyrene by the same technique. This difference in formability was ascribed to a difference in the dependence of the flow stress Οƒ at the thermoforming temperatures on time. The flow stress of both materials was given by Οƒ = Kt^mβ€²^Ο΅^n^, but whereas n was approximately 1 for both materials, mβ€² was βˆ’0.052 and βˆ’0.33 for poly(methyl methacrylate) and high‐impact polystyrene, respectively. A physical argument and simple analysis led to the conclusion that a large (negative) value of the β€œstress relaxation index” in a material reduces the degree of uniformity of sheet thickness in a formed part.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Molecular weights and molecular weight d
✍ Wayne W. Y. Lau; Charles M. Burns; Robert Y. M. Huang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1985 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 376 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

The composite gel permeation chromatography (GPC) chromatogram of a mixture of polystyrene and poly(methy1 methacrylate) has been successfully resolved into its component chromatograms by using a newly developed technique. This technique has made possible the calculation of a, and an values of these