THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN UNJUST INITIAL ACQUISITION
β Scribed by Feser, Edward
- Book ID
- 115483857
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 146 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0265-0525
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Critics of Robert Nozick's libertarian political theory often allege
that the theory in general and its account of property rights in particular
lack sufficient foundations. A key difficulty is thought to lie in his
account of how portions of the world which no one yet owns can justly come
to be initially acquired. But the difficulty is illusory, because (contrary
to what both Nozick and his critics assume) the concept of justice does not
meaningfully apply to initial acquisition in the first place. Moreover, the
principle of self-ownership provides a solid foundation for Nozick's
libertarianism, and when seen in the light of that principle and its full
implications, the standard purported examples of injustices in acquisition
are revealed to be nothing of the kind.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
What are we to make of the claim that we often hear, that there is no such thing as business ethics? This essay first examines two arguments that might be in people's minds in making such a claimthat business is a "game," and hence the ordinary constraints of morality do not apply, and that one cann
One point in Sander's rich paper (Sander, this journal) strikes a subject that I would like to discuss a few steps further. On page 1 Sander writes: ". . . . Infancy lies at the intersection of multiple and powerful forces that, in shaping the present, shape the future. . . ." This is a pronouncemen