Theologia moralis (vol. 1)
โ Scribed by Liguori, St. Alfonso Maria de', 1696-1787 & Zaccaria, Francescantonio, 1714-1795
- Publisher
- H. Marietti
- Year
- 1891
- Tongue
- Latin
- Leaves
- 1052
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
DjVu p. 537 (III. 394) is discusses " quando liceat procurare abortum. "
DjVu p. 556: " An liceat aspicere partes honestas personรฆ pulchrรฆ sexus diversi." (The closest I've seen him treat the relation between morality and beauty/ pulchritudine.)
"it is per se licit, because it is licit to look at anything beautiful to the sight created by God; thus, there is no fault per se , excepting curiosity, to look at a beautiful woman. โฆ But in practice this is rarely excused from venial sin, except it be done from a civilian duty [ urbanitate debita ] or other just cause." He goes on to speak about how if one's lingeringly looking at beautiful women leads to the "danger of a 'dirty mind' or morose delectation" (" periculum turpis concupiscentiรฆ vel morosรฆ delectationis "), then it is a sin. All of this is commonsense. He continues: "But to look at the less honest (but not sexual [ turpes ]) parts of a womanโnamely, the chest, arms, legs, excepting the danger of falling [I think he means, excepting a proximate occasion of sin.]โand in a non-lingeringly way, is not of itself a mortal sin." For some people "with a strong proclivity to the venereal, such looking is easily a mortal sin."
on nude artwork:
"To look at obscene pictures, even out of curiosity, is not mortal โฆ if turpitudinous delectation and its danger are absent. But in practice, the morose looking at the shameful parts (pudenda) of a woman depicted [in art] is difficultly excused from mortal [sin], because difficultly can one be liberated here from turpitudinous delectation or from its probable danger โฆ. except he look for a short duration and from a long distance."
DjVu p. 461: โThe reason for the subjection is this: it is most expedient for the peace of the family, for fostering mutual love, that the wife desire to be totally dependent upon her husband.โ Et ratio (subjectionis) est: quia expedit valde ad pacem familiรฆ, ad mutuum amorem fovendum, quod uxor voluntatem totaliter a viro dependentem habeatโฆ
DjVu pp. 349-50 on St. Alphonsus's definition of material vs. formal cooperation
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
ref:44.41 on [St. Alphonsus's definition of material *vs.* formal cooperation](https://christianity.stackexchange.com/a/96964/1787)
ref:44.41 on [St. Alphonsus's definition of material *vs.* formal cooperation](https://christianity.stackexchange.com/a/96964/1787)