๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Thematic accuracy of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2001 land cover for Alaska

โœ Scribed by David J. Selkowitz; Stephen V. Stehman


Book ID
104090997
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
443 KB
Volume
115
Category
Article
ISSN
0034-4257

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2001 Alaska land cover classification is the first 30-m resolution land cover product available covering the entire state of Alaska. The accuracy assessment of the NLCD 2001 Alaska land cover classification employed a geographically stratified three-stage sampling design to select the reference sample of pixels. Reference land cover class labels were determined via fixed wing aircraft, as the high resolution imagery used for determining the reference land cover classification in the conterminous U.S. was not available for most of Alaska. Overall thematic accuracy for the Alaska NLCD was 76.2% (s.e. 2.8%) at Level II (12 classes evaluated) and 83.9% (s.e. 2.1%) at Level I (6 classes evaluated) when agreement was defined as a match between the map class and either the primary or alternate reference class label. When agreement was defined as a match between the map class and primary reference label only, overall accuracy was 59.4% at Level II and 69.3% at Level I. The majority of classification errors occurred at Level I of the classification hierarchy (i.e., misclassifications were generally to a different Level I class, not to a Level II class within the same Level I class). Classification accuracy was higher for more abundant land cover classes and for pixels located in the interior of homogeneous land cover patches.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Sources of error in accuracy assessment
โœ R.L Powell; N Matzke; C de Souza Jr.; M Clark; I Numata; L.L Hess; D.A Roberts ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 764 KB

Valid measures of map accuracy are critical, yet can be inaccurate even when following well-established procedures. Accuracy assessment is particularly problematic when thematic classes lie along a land-cover continuum, and boundaries between classes are ambiguous. In this study, we examined error s