๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The value of life: individual preferences and social choice. A comment to Magnus Johannesson

โœ Scribed by Erik Nord; Paul Menzel; Jeff Richardson


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
85 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
1057-9230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

In order to avoid undue discrimination of disabled people, we have suggested that all life years gained by the disabled should count as 1 in QALY calculations as long as the health states in question are preferred to being dead by those concerned. Johannesson noted that such a convention could lead to inconsistencies between societal and individual preferences. We believe the problem derives from the structure of preferences in the real world, rather than from our specific choice of model. The inconsistency is at any rate a much smaller practical problem than Johannesson suggests. Johannesson's alternative model has some virtues, but it does not resolve the inconsistency problem. It also leads to counter intuitive results. Copyright ยฉ 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Using DCE and ranking data to estimate c
โœ Julie Ratcliffe; John Brazier; Aki Tsuchiya; Tara Symonds; Martin Brown ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 165 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

## Abstract There is an increasing interest in using data derived from ordinal methods, particularly data derived from discrete choice experiments (DCEs), to estimate the cardinal values for health states to calculate quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Ordinal measurement strategies such as DCE m