๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The validity of Niederhoffer's cynicism scale

โœ Scribed by Matthew J Hickman; Nicole L Piquero; Alex R Piquero


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
276 KB
Volume
32
Category
Article
ISSN
0047-2352

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Arthur . Behind the Shield is widely regarded as a classic in the policing literature, yet problems associated with measurement of the key latent trait, cynicism, have limited the extent to which conclusions may be drawn from Niederhoffer's work, as well as some subsequent police cynicism research. In this article, Niederhoffer's research is revisited using survey data recently collected from a random sample of 499 Philadelphia police officers. The analysis begins by examining the validity of Regoli's (1976) modified cynicism scale from the perspective of Item Response Theory (IRT), using Rasch modeling techniques in an effort to more fully understand the scale's measurement properties. Then, Niederhoffer's primary research hypothesis is revisited. Three main findings are drawn: (1) the Likert response categories are being used by respondents as intended; (2) some of the scale items exhibit gender and race bias; and (3) the scale can be improved by dropping several items. Once the scale is adjusted, the findings indicate that the relationship between officer cynicism and years of service is slightly stronger than when the scale is used in its original form. Further, regression analyses yield theoretically consistent findings for the relationship between cynicism and one job-related measure (departmental disciplinary charges).


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Validating Antonovsky's sense of Coheren
โœ Raymond B. Flannery Jr.; J. Christopher Perry; Walter E. Penk; Georgina J. Flann ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 199 KB
The wagers of cynicism
โœ Karp, Laurence E. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 226 KB