๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The utility of Popper's philosophy in biology

โœ Scribed by Nick Smith; Mike Mogie

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
28 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0265-9247

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

More on popper and biology: the utility
More on popper and biology: the utility of induction
โœ Jonathan Gallant ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 34 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Sir, Drs. Smith and Mogie (BioEssays 22.3) criticise Robin Holliday for ``Taking an inductionist stance'', and later in their letter consider an argument in favour of induction in order to dismiss it. But surely it is a bit odd to dismiss induction. Without it we would be groping in total darkn

The incompatibility of Popper's philosop
The incompatibility of Popper's philosophy of science with genetics and molecular biology
โœ Robin Holliday ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 25 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The incompatibility of Popper's philosophy of science with genetics and molecular biology ## Sir, The late Karl Popper is widely regarded as the most important of all philosophers of science. In 1972 Peter Medawar said ''I think Popper is incomparably the greatest philosopher of science that has