✦ LIBER ✦

The Use of Technology for Second Language Learning and Teaching: A Retrospective

✍ Scribed by M. Rafael Salaberry

Book ID: 108503750
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2001
Tongue: English
Weight: 158 KB
Volume: 85
Category: Article
ISSN: 0026-7902
DOI: 10.1111/0026-7902.00096

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The use of computer technology in univer

The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective

✍ N. Selwyn 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 118 KB

Some research conclusions regarding the

Some research conclusions regarding the learning of a second language and creativity

✍ Richard G. Landry 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 107 KB 👁 1 views

Use and limitations of learning curves f

Use and limitations of learning curves for energy technology policy: A component-learning hypothesis

✍ F. Ferioli; K. Schoots; B.C.C. van der Zwaan 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 601 KB

Description of EduCOM: A graphical model

Description of EduCOM: A graphical modeling and programming language for teaching and learning digital communication systems

✍ Jake Gunther; Brandon Eames; Darin Nelson 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 276 KB 👁 1 views

A teaching approach for bridging the gap

A teaching approach for bridging the gap between low-level and high-level programming using assembly language learning for small microcontrollers

✍ Dimosthenis E. Bolanakis; Georgios A. Evangelakis; Euripidis Glavas; Konstantino 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 372 KB 👁 2 views

Learning-for-use: A framework for the de

Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities

✍ Daniel C. Edelson 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 690 KB

Meeting ambitious content and process (inquiry) standards is an important challenge for science education reform particularly because educators have traditionally seen content and process as competing priorities. However, integrating content and process together in the design of learning activities