𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The use of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in the treatment of psychogenic seizures

✍ Scribed by Zeina Chemali; Mary–Ellen Meadows


Book ID
116978500
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
245 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
1525-5050

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Eye movement desensitization and reproce
✍ Susan D. M. Kelley; Selim Benbadis 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 112 KB

## Abstract Little is known about the types of mental health treatment that are most effective for psychogenic non‐epileptic seizure (PNES) patients who have high rates of comorbid post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and dissociation. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has prove

Eye movement desensitization and reproce
✍ Steven M. Silver; Susan Rogers; Mark Russell 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 113 KB

## Abstract Recent practice guidelines and meta‐analyses have designated eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) as a first‐line treatment for trauma. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing is an eight‐phase therapeutic approach guided by an information‐processing model that add

Eye movement desensitization and reproce
✍ Francine Shapiro; Louise Maxfield 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 111 KB

## Abstract Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is an efficacious and efficient treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This article provides a brief overview of the findings of 20 controlled‐outcome studies and describes Shapiro's Adaptive Information Processing model.

The current status of eye movement desen
✍ J. Spector; J. Read 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 106 KB

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy (EMDR) has increasingly been proposed as an effective therapeutic procedure for post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health problems. However, views on EMDR in the research literature have been polarized. Reasons for this are explored