๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The Ultraviolet Environment of Mars: Biological Implications Past, Present, and Future

โœ Scribed by Charles S. Cockell; David C. Catling; Wanda L. Davis; Kelly Snook; Ray L. Kepner; Pascal Lee; Christopher P. McKay


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
203 KB
Volume
146
Category
Article
ISSN
0019-1035

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A radiative transfer model is used to quantitatively investigate aspects of the martian ultraviolet radiation environment, past and present. Biological action spectra for DNA inactivation and chloroplast (photosystem) inhibition are used to estimate biologically effective irradiances for the martian surface under cloudless skies. Over time Mars has probably experienced an increasingly inhospitable photobiological environment, with present instantaneous DNA weighted irradiances 3.5-fold higher than they may have been on early Mars. This is in contrast to the surface of Earth, which experienced an ozone amelioration of the photobiological environment during the Proterozoic and now has DNA weighted irradiances almost three orders of magnitude lower than early Earth. Although the present-day martian UV flux is similar to that of early Earth and thus may not be a critical limitation to life in the evolutionary context, it is a constraint to an unadapted biota and will rapidly kill spacecraft-borne microbes not covered by a martian dust layer. Microbial strategies for protection against UV radiation are considered in the light of martian photobiological calculations, past and present. Data are also presented for the effects of hypothetical planetary atmospheric manipulations on the martian UV radiation environment with estimates of the biological consequences of such manipulations.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The past, the present, and the future of
โœ Barbara Delano ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) ๐ŸŒ English โš– 58 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

am delighted to be the guest editor of this very important issue of Dialysis & Transplantation (D&T) that focuses on home dialysis. It is especially gratifying that some of the most important contributors to the fi eld have agreed to write about the past, present, and future of these treatments for