๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The surface resistance of glass electrodes in acid solutions

โœ Scribed by Anders Wikby


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1971
Weight
805 KB
Volume
33
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-0728

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The surface resistance of glass electrod
โœ Anders Wikby ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1972 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science โš– 444 KB

This surface resistance has been measured normal to the electrode surface. The resistance has been found to be located some distance within the physical surface and the name surface should therefore not be interpreted too literally.

The influence of isopropanol on the surf
โœ Anders Wikby ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1972 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science โš– 161 KB

This surface resistance has been measured normal to the electrode surface. The resistance has been found to be located some distance within the physical surface and the name surface should therefore not be interpreted too literally.

The resistance and intrinsic time consta
โœ Anders Wikby; Gillis Johansson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1969 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science โš– 978 KB

As part of a programme to study the properties of glass electrodes we have reinvestigated the resistances measured with direct current and with alternating current. Such measurements should provide information about the solid state side of the glass-solution interface. We hoped originally that chang

Surface preparation of planar lead elect
โœ K. Murugan; P.G. Balakrishnan; P.V. Vasudeva Rao ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 386 KB

There are wide discrepancies in the reported current density values (ti p and i0,~) obtained from potentiodynamic studies on lead in sulphuric acid solutions . Furthermore, it is well known that preparative procedures exert a marked influence on the data obtained for planar electrodes. The present i

The oxidation of porous lead electrodes
โœ N.A. Hampson; J.B. Lakeman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1979 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 767 KB

The electrochemical oxidation of porous lead electrodes is compared and contrasted with that of solid lead. Significant differences between the behaviours of the two electrode types are observed and interpreted in terms of the major component of the oxidation of the porous electrode arising from the