## Abstract In testing genetic linkage using large or complex pedigrees, robust methods may be preferred to the Lod‐score method. The affected‐pedigree‐member method is robust but does not use the information available in nonaffected subjects, which results in a loss of power. We propose a new test
The sumLINK statistic for genetic linkage analysis in the presence of heterogeneity
✍ Scribed by G. B. Christensen; S. Knight; N. J. Camp
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 161 KB
- Volume
- 33
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0741-0395
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
We present the “sumLINK” statistic—the sum of multipoint LOD scores for the subset of pedigrees with nominally significant linkage evidence at a given locus—as an alternative to common methods to identify susceptibility loci in the presence of heterogeneity. We also suggest the “sumLOD” statistic (the sum of positive multipoint LOD scores) as a companion to the sumLINK. sumLINK analysis identifies genetic regions of extreme consistency across pedigrees without regard to negative evidence from unlinked or uninformative pedigrees. Significance is determined by an innovative permutation procedure based on genome shuffling that randomizes linkage information across pedigrees. This procedure for generating the empirical null distribution may be useful for other linkage‐based statistics as well. Using 500 genome‐wide analyses of simulated null data, we show that the genome shuffling procedure results in the correct type 1 error rates for both the sumLINK and sumLOD. The power of the statistics was tested using 100 sets of simulated genome‐wide data from the alternative hypothesis from GAW13. Finally, we illustrate the statistics in an analysis of 190 aggressive prostate cancer pedigrees from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics, where we identified a new susceptibility locus. We propose that the sumLINK and sumLOD are ideal for collaborative projects and meta‐analyses, as they do not require any sharing of identifiable data between contributing institutions. Further, loci identified with the sumLINK have good potential for gene localization via statistical recombinant mapping, as, by definition, several linked pedigrees contribute to each peak. Genet. Epidemiol. 33:628–636, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The Genome Search Meta‐Analysis (GSMA) method is widely used to detect linkage by pooling results of previously published genome‐wide linkage studies. The GSMA uses a non‐parametric summed rank statistic in 30 cM bins of the genome. Zintzaras and Ioannidis ([2005] Genet. Epidemiol. 28:1
Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis using pairs of affected relatives were shown by Elston et al. [1996] to typically halve the cost of a study compared to a one-stage design. The statistic used for testing linkage in that study was based on the proportion of pairs sharing no marker