## BACKGROUND. In April 1991, the Virginia Division of the American Cancer Society (ACS) initiated the feasibility phase of the Colon Polyp Prevention Study (CPPS) to determine whether a high fiber supplement would decrease new adenomatous colorectal polyp occurrence. The feasibility phase had two
The study of markers of biological effect in cancer prevention research trials
β Scribed by Peter Greenwald; Karen M. Witkin; Winfred F. Malone; David P. Byar; Laurence S. Freedman; Harriet R. Stern
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 984 KB
- Volume
- 52
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Biological markers may provide a valuable tool for the development of cancer prevention agents, for monitoring patient compliance to a selected intervention, or for further defining the carcinogenic process. This discussion focuses on markers of biological effect and the rationale for their use in cancer prevention trials. Recent studies with biological markers are investigating their incorporation into phase-I, -11, and -111 chemoprevention clinical trial designs. Their use in clinical studies is expected to increase the number of agents that may be evaluated and to provide valuable information on the biological effectiveness of agents, doses, and schedules. Markers may also provide information to help in selecting high-risk groups for prevention research, and to indicate the pathways inhibited and the stage of carcinopenesis affected. Such information may prove of crucial importance in strengthening the rationale for long-term trials and other ancillary research. Biomarker research for colon carcinogenesis is discussed, including examples of a number of recent trials that may influence future progress in this area of prevention research. A crucial step in this process is marker validation as an aspect of major prospective observational and intervention studies where cancer incidence is the endpoint. We cannot be fully confident of markers as intermediate endpoints until the evidence from clinical trials is sufficiently strong ,to support major public health initiatives for prevention.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract We previously observed a positive association between a history of trichomonosis, a sexually transmitted infection caused by the protozoan, __Trichomonas vaginalis__, and prostate cancer risk in the Health Professionals Followβup Study. To determine the reproducibility of this finding,
## Abstract Prostate cancer aggressiveness was evaluated based on pathologic characterization of cases detected in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial. The trial population consists of 80,458 men aged 55β67 years. A total of 32,000 men were randomized to the screening arm. The remaining 48,
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The literature continues to report low rates of accrual to cancer clinical trials. Previous studies have examined principally physicianβrelated or patientβrelated barriers. Clinical research associates (CRAs) have a unique perspective on enrollment that has been explored