✦ LIBER ✦

The stomal morphology of parasitic females ofStrongyloidesspp. by scanning electron microscopy

✍ Scribed by Hiroshi Sato; Shuhei Tanaka; Yumi Une; Harumi Torii; Mayumi Yokoyama; Kazuo Suzuki; Akiteru Amimoto; Hideo Hasegawa

Book ID: 106128844
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 228 KB
Volume: 102
Category: Article
ISSN: 1432-1955
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-007-0800-8

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Morphology of polyfuran perchlorate dope

Morphology of polyfuran perchlorate doped films by scanning electron microscopy

✍ I Carrillo; M.J González-Tejera; I Hernández-Fuentes; C Barba 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 354 KB

Study of the morphology of the polyacety

Study of the morphology of the polyacetylene by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

✍ A. Djebaili; M.J.M. Abadie 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 623 KB

Quantification of membrane morphology by

Quantification of membrane morphology by interpretation of scanning electron microscopy images

✍ Carles Torras; Ricard Garcia-Valls 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 800 KB

Scanning electron microscopy and the sur

Scanning electron microscopy and the surface morphology of human lymphocytes

✍ Roath, Stuart; Newell, Diane; Polliack, Aaron; Alexander, Elaine; Lin, Peck-Sun 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 559 KB

Surface morphology of narcissus flowerin

Surface morphology of narcissus flowering stems as revealed by scanning electron microscopy

✍ D. Jones 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 147 KB

Comparison of environmental scanning ele

Comparison of environmental scanning electron microscopy with high vacuum scanning electron microscopy as applied to the assessment of cell morphology

✍ McKinlay, Karen J. ;Allison, Francis J. ;Scotchford, Colin A. ;Grant, David M. ; 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 352 KB

## Abstract The efficacy of conventional high vacuum scanning electron microscopy (SEM), environmental SEM (ESEM), and confocal laser scanning microscopy techniques in the assessment of cell–material interactions is compared. Specific attention is given to the application of these techniques in the