<p><span>This book examines how the International Court of Justice (ICJ) reviews State behaviour through the prism of the standard of review.</span><span><br><br>It develops a novel rationale to support the ICJ's application of deferential standards of review as a judicial avoidance technique, based
The Standard of Review Before the International Court of Justice: Between Principle and Pragmatism (Studies in International Law)
โ Scribed by Felix Fouchard
- Publisher
- Hart Publishing
- Year
- 2024
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 264
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This book examines how the International Court of Justice (ICJ) reviews State behaviour through the prism of the standard of review.
It develops a novel rationale to support the ICJ's application of deferential standards of review as a judicial avoidance technique, based on strategic considerations. It then goes on to empirically assess all 31 decisions of the Court in which the standard of review was at issue, showing how the Court determines that standard, and answering the question of whether it varies its review intensity strategically.
As a result, the book's original contribution is two-fold: establishing a new rationale for judicial deference (that can be applied to all international courts and tribunals); and providing the first comprehensive, empirical analysis of the ICJ's standards of review. It will be beneficial to all scholars of the Court and those interested in judicial strategy.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<span>Since the Nuremberg Trials of top Nazi leaders following the Second World War, international law has affirmed that no-one, whatever their rank or office, is above accountability for their crimes. Yet the Cold War put geopolitical agendas ahead of effective action against war crimes and major h
<p>This book analyses Nicaragua's role in the development of international law, through its participation in cases that have come before the International Court of Justice. Nicaragua has appeared before the ICJ in fourteen cases, either as an applicant, respondent or intervening State, thus setting
The legal rules governing the use of force between States are one of the most fundamental, and the most controversial, aspects of international law. An essential part of this subject is the question of when, and to what extent, a State may lawfully use force against another in self-defence. However,
The jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) generally demonstrates that no rule of international law can be interpreted and applied without regard to its innate values and the basic principles of human rights. Through its case-law, the ICJ has made immense contributions to the deve