## Abstract Exposing individuals to an isolated component (a prime) of a prior event alleviates its forgetting. Two experiments with 120 human infants between 3 and 18 months of age determined the minimum duration of a prime that can reactivate a forgotten memory and how long the reactivated memory
The specificity of priming effects over the first year of life
โ Scribed by Becky Sweeney DeFrancisco Carolyn Rovee-Collier
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 279 KB
- Volume
- 50
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-1630
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
Despite its significance for the enduring effect of early experience, the specificity of priming on infants' forgotten memories is unknown. This study determined the impact of cue and context changes on the initial priming and retrieval of the reactivated memory over the first postnatal year. Infants were operantly trained with a distinctive cue in a particular context. After forgetting, they were primed and tested for renewed retention with combinations of old and new cues and contexts. Priming was hyperspecific to the original cue and original context at all but 12 months, when the memory was reactivated in a novel context. At 9โ12 months, the reactivated memory generalized to a novel cue or context. At younger ages, the reactivated memory generalized only after a very brief prime. These findings indicate that priming in early infancy is initially conservative, buffering against recovering memories in contexts that might no longer be appropriate. ยฉ 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 50: 486โ501, 2008.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
We previously reported that the latency of responding to a memory prime in a reactivation procedure decreases between 3 and 6 months of age. The present study extended this analysis through the first year of life. In this study, 6-, 9-, and 12-month-olds learned an operant task. One week after they
In two experiments with 260 infants between 2 and 12 months of age, we examined how differences between the conditions of encoding and retrieval affect retention. Initially, 9- and 12-month-olds were tested with a different cue (Experiment 1) or in a different context (Experiment 2) after delays spa