The simplex algorithm with the pivot rule of maximizing criterion improvement
β Scribed by R.G. Jeroslow
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1973
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 998 KB
- Volume
- 4
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
We extend ;l result of Klee anC Minty by showing that the Simplex Alp,orithm with the pivot rule of maximizing criterion ixrip;ovement is not a good algorithm in the sense of Edmonas. The method of proof extends to other similar pivot rules. * Original version rlzceived 7 July 3.97 1.
* As Klee and Minty note in 161, Gale (How to solve linear inequalities, Am. Matil. Monthly 76 (1969) 589-591'9:; hai regarded the determination of the ccmputational complexity of linear programming as a task which "has stood as a challenge to $orkers in the field for twenty years now and remains, irk my opinion, the principal ope.1 question in the ?heory of linear computation."
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We present a general criterion for theoretical performance assessment of algoritlnns for twoelectron integral computation which is appropriate for most modern computers. The new prescription is to minimize the total number of memory references in the algorithm, as opposed to the traditional approach
In a previous article (J. Fernandez Rico, R. Upez and G. Ramirez, J. Comp. Chem., 9, 790 (1988)) we have proposed the calculation of molecular integrals involving STOs by means of some recurrence relations which use two sets (h and H) of overlap integrals (basic matrices). In the present paper, we d