The sensitivity of B3LYP atomization energies to the basis set and a comparison of basis set requirements for CCSD(T) and B3LYP
โ Scribed by Charles W. Bauschlicher Jr.; Harry Partridge
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 752 KB
- Volume
- 240
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2614
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The atomization energies of the 55 G2 molecules are computed using the B3LYP approach with a variety of basis sets. The 6-3 11 +G( 3df) basis set is found to yield superior results to those obtained using the augumented-correlation-consistent valence-polarized triple-zeta set. The atomization energy of SO2 is found to be the most sensitive to basis set and is studied in detail. Including tight d functions is found to be important for obtaining good atomization energies. The results for SO2 are compared with those obtained using the coupled-cluster singles and doubles approach including a perturbational estimate of the triple excitations.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Roothaan-Hartree-Fock (RHF) calculations have been carried out for the ground states of the atoms from helium to krypton using certain exponential-type functions, the แฎ functions. We report a compilation of single-and double-zeta (SZ and DZ) wave functions. A comparison with the conventional SZ and
## Abstract We evaluate the performance of ten functionals (B3LYP, M05, M05โ2X, M06, M06โ2X, B2PLYP, B2PLYPD, X3LYP, B97D, and MPWB1K) in combination with 16 basis sets ranging in complexity from 6โ31G(d) to augโccโpV5Z for the calculation of the Hโbonded water dimer with the goal of defining which
## Abstract Binding energies of selected hydrogen bonded complexes have been calculated within the framework of density functional theory (DFT) method to discuss the efficiency of numerical basis sets implemented in the DFT code DMol^3^ in comparison with Gaussian basis sets. The corrections of bas
ScCH~-and TiCH + are found to have Cs symmetry, while the remaining systems have the expected C2v symmetry. The Cs symmetry structure is favored for ScCH~-and TiCH~-because it allows donation from one of the CH bonds into an empty metal 3d orbital. This distortion stabilizes the systems by less than