𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The scientific attitude inventory: A revision (SAI II)

✍ Scribed by Richard W. Moore; Rachel Leigh Hill Foy


Book ID
101267444
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
34 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-4308

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The Scientific Attitude Inventory (SAI) was developed and field tested 25 years ago. It has been used extensively throughout the world, and it continues to be used. Reports of its use and suggestions for revision provide impetus for revision. The revision retains the original position statements of attitudes assessed and the original attitude statements with changes made only to improve readability and to eliminate gender-biased language. Also, in response to critical analysis, the SAI II uses a five-response Likert Scale. The new version is shorter, 40 items instead of 60 in the original. The SAI II was field tested with 557 students in Grades 6, 9, and 12. The top and bottom 27% of scorers for the total inventory were compared for the subscales. A statistically significant difference was obtained for each t-test comparison. Face validity for the SAI II is claimed on the basis of the original judgments of a panel of judges regarding the attitude position statements which have not been altered. A split-half reliability coefficient of .805 was computed for the entire group of 557 respondents. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient is .781.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Study of the Anti-Scientific Attitude
✍ Bernard, ; Mausner, Judith πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1955 πŸ› Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English βš– 351 KB
A normative study of the Coolidge Axis I
✍ David C. Watson; Birendra K. Sinha πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 419 KB

The Coolidge Axis-I1 Inventory (CATI) is a 200-item self-report inventory that is designed to measure DSM-IV personality disorders (PD's). Norms with a sample of 1,790 Canadian college students are compared with a US sample of 573 college students and 36 elderly subjects. Comparisons for the 11 DSM-