𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium

✦ LIBER ✦

The Saline vs. Albumin Fluid Evaluation (SAFE) Study Rationale and Development of a Multicenter, Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous Fluid Resuscitation in Critically Ill Patients

✍ Scribed by Neil Boyce

Book ID: 118085230
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2003
Tongue: English
Weight: 76 KB
Volume: 5
Category: Article
ISSN: 1295-9022
DOI: 10.1111/j.1778-428x.2003.tb00285.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Retraction: Finfer S, Norton R, Bellomo

Retraction: Finfer S, Norton R, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburch J, on behalf of the SAFE Study Investigators. The SAFE study: saline vs. albumin for fluid resuscitation in the critically ill. Vox Sang 2004; 87 (Suppl. 2): S123–S131

✍ Mayr, W. ;Prowse, C. 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 35 KB

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-cont

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the cardioprotective effects of MC-1 in patients undergoing high-risk coronary artery bypass graft surgery: MC-1 to Eliminate Necrosis and Damage in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trial (MEND-CABG) II—study design and rationale

✍ Rajendra H. Mehta; John H. Alexander; Robert Emery; Stephen J. Ellis; Vic Hassel 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 209 KB