✦ LIBER ✦

The role of research in setting priorities for health care

✍ Scribed by Kathleen N. Lohr

Book ID: 114739236
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1996
Tongue: English
Weight: 348 KB
Volume: 2
Category: Article
ISSN: 1356-1294
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00030.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Qualitative methodologies in health-care

Qualitative methodologies in health-care priority setting research

✍ Neale Smith; Craig Mitton; Stuart Peacock 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 127 KB

## Abstract Priority setting research in health economics has traditionally employed quantitative methodologies and been informed by post‐positivist philosophical assumptions about the world and the nature of knowledge. These approaches have been rewarded with well‐developed and validated tools. Ho

Identifying research priorities for heal

Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers

✍ Neale Smith; Craig Mitton; Stuart Peacock; Evelyn Cornelissen; Stuart MacLeod 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 242 KB

Finland's way of setting health-care pri

Finland's way of setting health-care priorities

✍ Jorma Palo 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 The Lancet 🌐 English ⚖ 167 KB

Biosafety: future priorities for researc

Biosafety: future priorities for research in health care

✍ O Doblhoff-Dier; C.H Collins 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 113 KB

Next phase of priority-setting in health

Next phase of priority-setting in health care

✍ Sabine Kleinert 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 The Lancet 🌐 English ⚖ 54 KB

Aiding priority setting in health care:

Aiding priority setting in health care: is there a role for the contingent valuation method?

✍ Jan Abel Olsen 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB 👁 2 views

The paper discusses some methodological and measurement aspects with the contingent valuation (CV) method which appear to create problems when eliciting preferences for the relative social valuation of alternative health care programmes. After pointing to biases which tend to exaggerate the true val