๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The role of qualitative risk assessment in environmental management: A Kazakhstani case study

โœ Scribed by Arani Kajenthira; John Holmes; Rachael McDonnell

Book ID
113894352
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2012
Tongue
English
Weight
516 KB
Volume
420
Category
Article
ISSN
0048-9697

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

The role of risk assessment and risk man
The role of risk assessment and risk management in environmental assessment
โœ Roy E. Kwiatkowski ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 124 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

There is an increasing awareness among environmental professionals and public that a totally risk free environment is an unattainable goal, and that the development of eective risk management strategies, involving a wide variety of scientiยฎc and societal considerations, is needed. The Department of

Environmental risk assessment of ivermec
Environmental risk assessment of ivermectin: A case study
โœ Markus Liebig; รlvaro Alonso Fernandez; Elke Blรผbaum-Gronau; Alistair Boxall; Ma ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry ๐ŸŒ English โš– 259 KB

## Abstract The veterinary parasiticide ivermectin was selected as a case study compound within the project ERAPharm (Environmental Risk Assessment of Pharmaceuticals). Based on experimental data generated within ERAPharm and additional literature data, an environmental risk assessment (ERA) was pe

Erratum: Environmental risk assessment o
Erratum: Environmental risk assessment of ivermectin: A case study
โœ Markus Liebig; รlvaro Alonso Fernandez; Elke Blรผbaum-Gronau; Alistair Boxall; Ma ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry ๐ŸŒ English โš– 25 KB

The trigger value of the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) in soil, for intensively reared and pasture animals, was incorrectly published as 100mg/kg dry wt on page 568, under the section ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT ACCORDING TO VICH (2000, 2004) AND EMEA (2008). The correct value is 100