## Abstract The authors studied 82 patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical surgical treatment at the N. N. Petrov Oncological Research Institute of the Ministry of Health of the USSR in 1974β1975. They defined the markedness of patients' psychogenic disturbances in the preβ and postoperat
The role of omental flap transposition in patients with locoregional recurrent rectal cancer treated with reirradiation
β Scribed by Tae Hyun Kim; Dae Yong Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Yong Sang Hong; Sun Young Kim; Ji Won Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Seung-Yong Jeong; Jae Hwan Oh
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 207 KB
- Volume
- 102
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-4790
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background and Objectives
We performed reirradiation after omental flap transposition (OFT) in patients with locoregional recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) and evaluated the effect of OFT on the irradiated small bowel by comparing the displacement of the small bowel from the radiation field before and after OFT.
Methods
Between October 2005 and October 2008, this study included 12 patients with LRRC who had previously received radiotherapy. To evaluate the effect of OFT on the irradiated volume of the small bowel and bladder, we measured the closest distances between the small bowel and the tumor or tumor bed (distance^SB^) and between the bladder and tumor or tumor bed (distance^BL^) before and after OFT, respectively.
Results
The median distance^SB^ before and after OFT was 5 and 30βmm, respectively (Pβ<β0.001). The median distance^BL^ before and after OFT was 10 and 23βmm, respectively (Pβ=β0.002). The respective overall survival and local control rates at 3 years were 50.9% and 54.6%, respectively. No severe complication occurred of grade 3 or higher involving the small bowel or bladder.
Conclusions
In our study, OFT effectively excluded small bowel from the radiation field. In addition, selective reirradiation after OFT was feasible for patients with LRRC. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:789β795. Β© 2010 WileyβLiss, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Abstract One hundred patients with rectal cancer treated by one surgeon over a 7 year period are reviewed. Fifty-five patients were treated by stapled anterior resection (SAR) and 45 by abdominoperineal resection (APR). Dukes' classification, degree of differentiation and local spread were similar i
## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: Assess impact of clinical variables upon survival in patients diagnosed with recurrent head and neck carcinoma and better delineate role of postβtreatment surveillance. ## Methods: Variables including previous tumor site, stage, prior therapy, location of re
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. Results from numerous trials have indicated that breastβconserving therapy (BCT) produces outcomes equivalent to those produced by mastectomy in terms of both locoregional control and survival. However, conservative treatment has resulted in the dilemma of how best to ad