๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The role of labelling processes in the assessment of geriatric depression

โœ Scribed by Carl L. Cohen; Mabel Crosby; David Zeman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1988
Tongue
English
Weight
755 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Informed by a labelling theory perspective, the authors examine the difficulties in diagnosing depression in elderly persons. Two popular diagnostic tools, the DSM-111 and depression scales, are used to illustrate the value judgements, theoretical biases, and insensitivity to geriatric norms that underlie the diagnostic decisions. The implications of these problems are discussed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The prevalence of depression in an acute
โœ Thomas G. O'Riordan; James P. Hayes; Rory Shelley; Desmond O'Neill; J. Bernard W ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 349 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

One hundred and eleven patients admitted to an acute medical geriatric assessment unit were screened for depression using the Geriatric Depression Scale questionnaire. All patients with high scores were further assessed by a consultant psychiatrist in a semistructured interview. Of the patients scre

The functional neuroanatomy of geriatric
โœ Gwenn S. Smith; Elisse Kramer; Yilong Ma; Peter Kingsley; Vijay Dhawan; Thomas C ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 119 KB

## Abstract ## Objective Positron Emission Tomography (PET) studies of cerebral glucose metabolism have demonstrated sensitivity in evaluating the functional neuroanatomy of treatment response variability in depression, as well as in the early detection of functional changes associated with incipi

SCREENING FOR DEPRESSION AMONG GERIATRIC
โœ AJIT SHAH; VIRACH PHONGSATHORN; CELIA BIELAWSKA; CORNELIUS KATONA ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 298 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The performances of shorter versions of the Geriatric Depression scale (GDS) are examined. A cutoff of 4/5 gives the best sensitivity (80%) and specificity (77%) for the 15-item version (GDS15). A cutoff of 3/4 gives the best sensitivity (75%) and specificity (77%) for the 10-item version (GDSlO). A