𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The role of evidence in interpretations of the scientific work of Karl Lashley

✍ Scribed by Donald A. Dewsbury


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
22 KB
Volume
38
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-5061

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

I discuss some of the issues underlying the different perspectives of Nadine Weidman and myself on the scientific oeuvre of Karl Lashley. I emphasize that our disagreements concern the kind of evidence needed to support specific claims more than any differences in our models of science. Β© 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The depoliticization of Karl Lashley: A
✍ Nadine Weidman πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 42 KB

## Abstract In this response to Donald Dewsbury's article, I address Dewsbury's criticisms of my interpretation of Karl Lashley by, first, disputing Dewsbury's characterization of my historiographic stance. I then go on to address Dewsbury's specific points, particularly regarding Lashley's racism

The scientific work of Fritz Spener
✍ Norbert H. Haunerland; Edward A. Dennis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 166 KB
The scientific work of Peter Bauer
✍ Werner Brannath; Franz KΓΆnig; Martin Posch πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 50 KB
The Scientific Work of Hans Meerwein
✍ Prof. Dr. R. Criegee πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1966 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 571 KB