## Abstract In this response to Donald Dewsbury's article, I address Dewsbury's criticisms of my interpretation of Karl Lashley by, first, disputing Dewsbury's characterization of my historiographic stance. I then go on to address Dewsbury's specific points, particularly regarding Lashley's racism
β¦ LIBER β¦
The role of evidence in interpretations of the scientific work of Karl Lashley
β Scribed by Donald A. Dewsbury
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 22 KB
- Volume
- 38
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5061
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
I discuss some of the issues underlying the different perspectives of Nadine Weidman and myself on the scientific oeuvre of Karl Lashley. I emphasize that our disagreements concern the kind of evidence needed to support specific claims more than any differences in our models of science. Β© 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The depoliticization of Karl Lashley: A
β
Nadine Weidman
π
Article
π
2002
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 42 KB
The scientific work of Fritz Spener
β
Norbert H. Haunerland; Edward A. Dennis
π
Article
π
2008
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 166 KB
The scientific work of Peter Bauer
β
Werner Brannath; Franz KΓΆnig; Martin Posch
π
Article
π
2007
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 50 KB
The Scientific Work of Hans Meerwein
β
Prof. Dr. R. Criegee
π
Article
π
1966
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 571 KB
Alternate interpretation of the role of
β
John Bauer; John Quick; Robert Oheim
π
Article
π
1985
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 201 KB
Suggestions Regarding The Work of The Sc
β
Stewart, F.E.
π
Article
π
1913
π
Elsevier
β 219 KB