𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The role of Cyclophilin D in learning and memory

✍ Scribed by Akihiro Mouri; Yukihiro Noda; Shigeomi Shimizu; Yoshihide Tsujimoto; Toshitaka Nabeshima


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
542 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
1050-9631

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Cyclophilin D (Cyp D) is implicated in cell death pathway and blockade of Cyp D could be a potent therapeutic strategy for degenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, ischemia, and multiple sclerosis, but physiological role of Cyp D remains elusive. Here, we investigated the ability of learning and memory in several behavioral tasks in mice that lacked Cyp D (Cyp D^−/−^) and the relationship between ability of learning and memory and hippocampal architecture or neuronal transmission in Cyp D^−/−^ mice. Cyp D^−/−^ mice showed impairments of short‐term memory in the Y‐maze, object recognition memory in the novel‐object recognition test, reference memory in the water maze test, and associative learning in the conditioned fear learning test. Hippocampal infusion of Cyclosporine A, which binds to Cyp D, replicated the defect in hippocampus‐dependent cognition observed in Cyp D^−/−^ mice. The Cyp D^−/−^ mice did not show histopathological abnormalities upon Nissl staining and GFAP immunostaining or irregular expression of neuronal and glial marker proteins on Western blotting. However, release of glutamate and acetylcholine was decreased from the hippocampus in response to high‐potassium treatment in the Cyp D^−/−^ mice than in the wild‐type mice. These results suggest a physiological role for Cyp D in learning and memory via the regulation of neurotransmission. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Working memory: Its role in dyslexia and
✍ Sharman Jeffries; John Everatt 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 116 KB

## Abstract This paper reports a study contrasting dyslexic children against a control group of children without special educational needs (SEN) and a group with varied SENs. Children's abilities were compared on tasks assessing phonological processing, visuo‐spatial/motor coordination and executiv