The role of counterfactual reasoning and the assignment of blame within a context involving product failure, personal injury, and luck was examined. In the first study, it was determined that directing attention to the focal individual in an event increased the perceived mutability of that individua
The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Reasoning
β Scribed by STEVEN J. SHERMAN; ALLEN R. McCONNELL
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 930 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0888-4080
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Counterfactual generation is an important part of reasoning. Both the judgment of events and affective reactions to those events depend not only on the events themselves, but on counterfactual alternatives to those events. Counterfactual thinking serves several positive functions. However, there are also dysfunctional aspects. First, judgments of general versus specific instances are often inconsistent, and this leads to problematic, irrational decisions. We explain these inconsistencies by suggesting that specific instances easily afford counterfactuals, and are judged in the context of these counterfactuals. Alternatively, general cases are evaluated in terms of quite different contrast cases, global expectations. Second, in assigning blame for the negative outcome of a chain of events, people assign too much causality to recent events. Our explanation is that these recent events are most accessible and are most likely to be mutated in the course of counterfactual generation. Such mutability is important in causal assignment.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This is a conceptual article dealing with the role of motivated reasoning in vendor selection. The authors argue that organizational buyers' motivated reasoning, along with the task characteristics of perceived importance and familiarity, plays an important role in determining whether an open or a c
## Abstract In three experiments, we examine the efficacy of counterfactual thinking (CFT) as a strategy to enhance consumers' motivation to process and use nutrition information on food packages. In the first study, we test whether CFT leads to greater motivation to process nutrition label informa
This manuscript presents a model of conceptual change from a social constructivism perspective by examining the fallacious argumentation and discourse patterns revealed by students as they form scientific and social judgments. A central premise is advanced that likens how individuals react when anom