Breastfeeding initiation and duration have followed distinct cycles in the United States. Despite recent increases, breastfeeding rates still fall short of public health goals. This paper takes an applied perspective to examine the potential role of human biologists in enhancing the promotion of bre
The road to foreign language competency in the United States: A leadership perspective
β Scribed by Ward, Shakoor A.
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 126 KB
- Volume
- 4
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1935-2611
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
A prevailing thought regarding foreign language competency (FLC) is that it can lead to an advantaged workforce by improving performance, especially in serviceβoriented professions. This prevailing thought is logical, considering banking, hospitality and tourism, social services, sales, and health care industries. Foreign language teachers, training and development professionals, workforce education professionals, and government agencies (e.g., the military) all play a leading role in the effort to improve FLC in segments of the U.S. workforce. Workplace learning and performance (WLP) establishes the framework for companies that can quantitatively demonstrate that having a foreignβlanguageβcompetent staff will increase performance and company profits (or value for the nonprofit sector). Leadership competencies guide the function of workplace foreign language training and development and has a direct impact on the success of achieving workplace FLC. In addition, scenarios demonstrating how a foreignβlanguageβcompetent staff might improve overall company performance are explored. Methods of conducting appropriate assessments prior to implementing a workplace foreign language training and development program are addressed.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract An external perspective suggests points of convergence and difference between the U.S. and Japanese approaches to quality assurance in higher education.
Well sth he ## United States Competing?" The authors in Johnston and Chinn [1996], a comment on my 1994 article, have selectively misrepresented (or determinedly misunderstood) my conceptualizations, analysis, and argument about U.S. competitiveness. I believe they did so to construct and knock d