๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The right to regulate off-duty conduct

โœ Scribed by Arthur F. Silbergeld; Stephanie T. Sasaki


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
53 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
0745-7790

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


T his is not a simple world in which employers concern themselves only with their employees' conduct and performance while on the job. Indeed, given the risks inherent in doing business, it is not surprising that employers attempt to exert control over many factors external to the workplace, factors they believe might affect profitability. Toward this end, many employers attempt to monitor and regulate the off-duty conduct of their employees, including activities of a very private and personal nature. For instance, employers often have legitimate interests in their employees' off-premises personal relationships with their coworkers, outside employment, and outside projects or interests with potentially competing elements. Thus, many employers have adopted policies proscribing or severely restricting their employees' off-duty, off-premises activities such as moonlighting, setting up a competing business, or otherwise working for a competitor during employment, and dating coworkers, supervisors, or subordinates.

Such policies have been challenged in court, but the law with respect to the monitoring and regulating of off-duty conduct has not been well developed in most jurisdictions. The topic, however, is of increasing concern, given the risks of running a business, the employer's desire to protect its trade secrets, and other valuable assets that allow it to maintain its competitive edge, and the increasing frequency of sexual harassment and discrimination lawsuits filed by current and former employees. While still in its development stage, the trend appears to be moving in the direction of protecting the employees from such perceived "intrusions" into their off-duty activities. Employers thus must examine closely their current policies and practices, and consider the issues described below.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The right to regulate off-duty conduct
โœ Arthur F. Silbergeld; Stephanie T. Sasaki ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 567 KB
The Duty of Regulators to Have Ex Parte
โœ Ashley C. Brown ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 111 KB

By conยฎning regulators to judicial constraints when they are acting in a legislative capacity, the Herculean task of directing the path of electricity restructuring is being undertaken under rules that require decision-makers to be utterly passive and only minimally inquisitive. Regulators should be