The results of a five-year early prostate cancer detection intervention
โ Scribed by Curtis Mettlin; Gerald P. Murphy; Richard J. Babaian; Arthur Chesley; Robert A. Kane; Peter J. Littrup; Fatoullah K. Mostofi; Paul S. Ray; Allen M. Shanberg; Ants Toi
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 963 KB
- Volume
- 77
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The American Cancer Society-National Prostate Cancer Detection Project (ACS-NIPCDP) is a multidisciplinary evaluation of early prostate cancer detection interventions. This report summarizes the experience of the investigators to date and dcscribes the overall and relative performance ofthe different detection modalities studied in this project.
METHODS.
Two thousand nine hundred ninety-nine men aged 55 to 70 years at entry who were not already under evaluation for prosrate cancer were recruited to participate in up to 5 annual examinations by prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). In the course of 5 years of intervention, ACS-NI'CDI' investigators have completed 9937 examinations, recommended 1215 biopsies, and detected 203 cancers.
RESULTS.
I.oss to cohort follow-up was greatest in the first year. Overall, TRUS led to twice the number of recommendations for biopsy compared with [>RE (8.9% versus 4.4%). Elevated PSA was observed in 13.0% of 9535 measurements performed. The overall cancer detection rate declined significantly during the five years of intervention. Detection was significantly associated with age and symptom status at entry. DRE: had lower sensitivity compared withlRUS or PSA, particularly in later years of rollow-up. The specificity of TRtJS was lower than that for LIRE. PSA was elevated in 69.2% of examinations that led to cancer detection. compared with only 10.9% when cancer was not found. PSA level, PSA density, and PSA change were all related to the presence of cancer. Less than 6% of the cancers detected in this study were clinically advanced at the time of diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS. These data quantify the yield of early cancer detection that may be expected when I'SA. DRE, and TRUS are used in populations comparable to the men participating in the ACS-KPCDP. Continued follow-up and further research is needed to assess whether men receiving early prostate cancer interventions benefit as a result.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## BACKGROUND. The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Proj-(James H. Gilbaugh, Jr., M.D.); Urology Clinic ect (ACS-NPCDP) was established in 1987. The experience of the ACS-NPCDP demonof Yakima, Yakima, Washington (Mark Uhlman, strates the yield and impact of periodic exami
## BACKGROUND. Prostate Cancer Awareness Week began in 1989 to raise public awareness of the disease and impact on its clinical dynamics. Prior to 1990, prostate carcinoma was usually diagnosed in symptomatic men as advanced and ipso facto incurable. ## METHODS. A 5-year longitudinal study of s
The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project (ACS-NPCDP) is a multidisciplinary, multicenter effort to assess the feasibility of early prostate cancer detection by digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and prostate specific antigen (PSA) assay. By