The reliability of microspectrophotometric (MSP) and flow cytometric (FCM) nuclear DNA measurements has been studied in 50 human breast adenocarcinomas. The tumor material was obtained by means of fine-needle aspiration biopsy, and all samples except one were found to be highly representative. The results confirm earlier observations that a good correlation exists between modal value (MV) determined by MSP and DNA index (DI) determined by FCM. However, when tumors were classified into low and high malignant variants according to FCM/DI, FCM/S-phase percentages, and MSP histogram types, the concordance was less pronounced. This was found to be due mainly to the fact that in near-diploid tumors a discrepancy exists between MSP and FCM ploidy, as well as between MSP distribution pattern and the estimated percentages of cells in the S-phase region. Another source of discrepancy was observed in tumors with stemlines in the normal tetraploid region, including cells with highly scattered aneuploid DNA values. These tumors were judged by MSP as aneuploid/high malignant and by FCM as euploid/low malignant. In view of this discrepancy, we conclude that the simple determination of the stemline position by MSP/MV or FCM/DI is not sufficient for adequate cytochemical malignancy grading of breast carcinomas. We suggest that a combination of ploidy and percentage of cells scattered outside the modal peaks is a more sensitive method for optimal cytochemical malignancy grading in breast carcinomas.